532,000+ trades analyzed · 10 years of real data · Walk-forward validated · Real fees & prop firm rules
10 años de datos históricos
Claude Opus 4.6
Python quantitative engine · AST-validated signals · walk-forward resampling
Dukascopy
Tick-level OHLCV · forex, indices & commodities
Walk-forward validation
20 out-of-sample windows · no lookahead · next-bar execution
Win Rate
36.6%
Max DD
-95.1%
Profit Factor
0.49
Win Rate
34.0%
Max DD
-17.7%
Profit Factor
1.09
Win Rate
46.4%
Max DD
-35.0%
Profit Factor
0.93
Sourced from Reddit & YouTube. Backtested on 10 years of real data with real fees.
Backtest strategies, build indicators with AI and much more. Free to use, right now.
96 strategies across 6 categories.
Create your own custom indicator with AI — no code needed. Describe what you want to detect and get a backtestable strategy.
MT5
TradingViewDescribe any trading strategy in plain words. AI converts it to code, backtests it on 10 years of data with real fees.
Would your strategy pass FTMO? Simulate real prop firm rules before you pay $540. Know your odds first.
Win Rate
53.1%
Max DD
-16.3%
Profit Factor
0.85
Win Rate
50.0%
Max DD
-5.9%
Profit Factor
1.44
Win Rate
57.1%
Max DD
-5.4%
Profit Factor
1.70
Win Rate
35.3%
Max DD
-34.3%
Profit Factor
0.96
Win Rate
43.6%
Max DD
-15.7%
Profit Factor
1.33
Win Rate
47.3%
Max DD
-35.1%
Profit Factor
0.80
Win Rate
48.6%
Max DD
-24.6%
Profit Factor
1.03
Win Rate
42.5%
Max DD
-92.9%
Profit Factor
0.69
Win Rate
44.3%
Max DD
-13.7%
Profit Factor
1.44
Win Rate
44.5%
Max DD
-53.1%
Profit Factor
0.53
Win Rate
49.1%
Max DD
-17.6%
Profit Factor
0.99
Win Rate
48.1%
Max DD
-4.8%
Profit Factor
1.11
Real quotes from trading communities. Our data confirms the pattern.
“When I back-test them they seem to work perfectly, but when I forward test them on a demo my results are the complete opposite.”
“Without slippage and fees, I have 30+ winning strategies. With slippage and fees, 2.”
“I've tried every strategy and backtested thousands of times, but once I go live my account dwindles.”